site logo
ETO Home

Recent news items
Site search
Site contents

Telework
Teletrade
Telecooperation

Events
Links
Resources database
Presentations online
Definitions
FAQs

Discussion
Feedback
Site Management

Advertising at this site

Other information for suppliers

Page updated:
25 February 2000
TELEWORKING

ADSL, HDSL, VDSL, DSL-Lite
- what is this all about?

The free of charge provision of these resources is made possible by our sponsors:

This FAQ discusses xDSL technologies - ADSL, HDSL, VDSL and DSL-Lite - terms relating to higher performance telecommunications networks and services that are being introduced or planned. For completeness where some older terms are used they are also explained. Other FAQs are available addressing other telecommunications terminology.

Deployment of xDSL technologies is accelerating after a very slow and reluctant start by most telecom operators. An accompanying page shows ADSL roll out status in European Union countries as at January 2000, according to the European Commission.

xDSL

DSL stands for Digital Subscriber Line:
  • Digital - means a line able to carry data traffic in its original form, as opposed to analogue (see below)
  • Subscriber Line* - the line connecting the individual subscriber (eg a household) to the local exchange
  • Analogue - the phone lines we have used for voice phone calls until today have been analogue lines and we have used MoDems (Modulator-Demodulator) to convert the digital output of the computer to analogue form for transmission and back into digital form at the other end for use by the computer. The performance of conventional modems and analogue lines has restricted bandwidth - the speeds at which computers can be connected across the phone network and the capacity of the networks to handle traffic.
The use of digital lines makes transmission of computer information faster and more reliable. It also allows much faster connect and disconnect, eliminating the slow process required for modems to establish a connection and start handling traffic. Over time its expected that all future telephony will be digital. The "x" in xDSL simply means there are several variations, eg ADSL, VDSL - see below.

* Sometimes the L in DSL is expanded to mean loop instead of line (see below).

What's special about xDSL?

The cables connecting most households to the phone network are mainly simple twisted pair copper wires, which have only been able to carry analogue traffic. Modem speeds have gradually increased through the use of various compression and other techniques,but at today's fastest (56 kilobits per second (kbps) they are approaching the theoretical limit for this technology.

DSL technology enables much higher speeds across the twisted pair lines from the exchange to the home. Speeds up to 2 Megabits per second are readily achievable - 30 or more times faster than today's fastest modems. This means that consumers and teleworkers can use applications that need these higher speeds even if their town or village doesn't have new, high performance cable networks. DSL has its own kind of "modems". Also, the technology allows the network to manage traffic rather than allocating complete end-to-end circuits, so that from the user perspective it can appear that the data connection is "always on". xDSL deployment to homes will make it easier for Internet connections can be sold on a fixed rate "per month" basis rather than per minute, encouraging wider and more intensive use of Internet, e-commerce, teleworking etc.

Sounds great, is there a catch?

Not really. There is a cost associated with deploying xDSL but its very small compared with the cost of digging up the roads to install cable.

Are there any constraints or can xDSL be deployed everywhere?

There are limits to the distance over which xDSL can be used, so that a home needs to be within a particular distance of the local exchange. However, research tends to increase such limits. Recent views as to the constraints of particular versions are given below.

What are ADSL, HDSL and VDSL?

These are variations on the DSL theme:

ADSL - Asymmetric Digital Subscriber Line

Asymmetric means that a higher speed is available from the exchange to the user (downstream) and a slower speed from the user to the exchange (upstream) . For example the user can download web pages or videos at high speed, but can only send at a significantly lower speed. Capability varies with distance - up to 9 Mbps downstream can be supported up to one mile from an exchange and 2 Mbps up to three miles. 64 kbps is the usual upstream speed. Note that the distance is the length of the cable, because of the way networks are routed a 3 mile cable may mean only 2 miles physical distance. ADSL can operate in parallel with conventional analogue voice telephony over the same line.

HDSL - High speed Digital Subscriber Line

This has been in use for some years in some countries to provide broad band facilities to business premises (leased line), providing 2 Mbps across up to three miles of wire.

VDSL - Very high speed Digital Subscriber Line

VDSL is a new technology not expected to be in use in public networks for some years. Its expected to provide speeds as high as 52 Mbps downstream and between 1.5 and 2.3 Mbps upstream, but over shorter distances than ADSL - 1.3 km at 13 Mbps and 0.3 km at 52 Mps. Note that by deploying higher performance lines from exchanges to street cabinets, these speeds could be delivered to more homes.

DSL-Lite

This is a new focus among PC and modem manufacturers to apply the same principles as ADSL using DMT technology (see below). This could be an alternative way of increasing modem speeds and improving plug-and-play capabilities for Internet access, providing 1.5 Mbps downstream and 512 kbps upstream. DSL-Lite has also been called splitterless DSL because the cost of modems is reduced by omitting the splitter capability that is used in ADSL to provide voice telephony in parallel with data.

Are there any technical issues?

Yes indeed - telecommunications engineers would be disappointed otherwise!

First, there are two competing and mutually incompatible technologies for implementing of ADSL: CAP (Carrierless Amplitude Phase Modulation) and DMT (Discrete Multi-Tone). CAP was first on the scene but standards organisations appear to favour DMT which provides more effective use of the bandwidth but is more complex.

Second, concern has been expressed about possible interference between the various xDSL technologies, or interference between xDSL technologies and existing services. There is no real evidence of this but some feel that is perhaps due to lack of detailed exploration.

Some people believe that doubts about xDSL have been encouraged by telecom operators who have been uncertain about the impact of DSL deployment on their revenues! In reality xDSL technology has been widely used for years in the provision of leased lines for business use.

When can I expect any of these?

An associated FAQ shows ADSL roll out status in European Union countries as at January 2000, according to the European Commission. There has been a sudden and concerted commitment to at least partial roll out during 1999-2001. Much depends on the attitudes of the regulatory bodies. For example, BT accelerated its plans following threats by the UK regulator, OFTEL to allow competitors to install their own ADSL technology within BT's exchanges.

What are the alternatives?

"Cable modems" providing similar performance are being offered by many cable companies. Wireless (radio) networks may also provide better performance than conventional analogue lines. Television set-top boxes will also provide higher speed asynchronous performance.

Line or Loop?

The subscriber loop is a term used in telecommunications to describe the final link between the network and the subscriber's premises. For every day purposes whether people talk about Asynchronous Digital Subscriber Line or Loop they are discussing the same thing.

Implementation announcements

June 1998 saw the following announcements about ADSL in the USA:

Bell South announced that, beginning August 1998, they would join GTE, US West, and others in rolling out "FastAccess" ADSL service to 30 of local markets over the following year or so. Speeds initially would be 1.5 megabits/second downstream and 256 kilobits/second upstream (later climbing to downstream speeds of up to 7 megabits/second). The service cost would be $200 for the equipment, $100 for installation, and $50-$60/month for unlimited, "always-on" Internet access and conventional telephone service. Several regions were deployed by Autumn 1999.

Pacific Bell also announced plans to roll out ADSL service to half of all Californians(!). Downstream speeds will range from 384 Kbits/second through 1.5 Mbits/second, and monthly package prices (ADSL service and ISP fees) will range from $89 through $339.

ADSL service is also widely available in Canada.

September 1999, BT announced plans to deploy ADSL across several hundred UK exchanges, in response to proposals by the UK regulator, OFTEL, to allow competitors to install ADSL technology in BT exchanges.

February 2000, the European Commission published a working document with proposals for "Unbundling the local loop", which would help accelerate deployment of xDSL technologies in Europe generally. This is linked from the Resources Database, search individual resources under "Unbundling". The document includes an annex setting out the ADSL roll out status in European Union countries as at January 2000, according to the European Commission.

Pricing

Pricing is a hot issue wherever ADSL has been deployed. Typically ADSL is priced per month rather than per call, inclusive of "allways on" Internet access. Prices are attractive to consumers who have been very intensive dial up users, but appear high to those who have limited their Internet use in the past. The status report also shows indicative pricing in EU countries, with wide variations. Some operators will charge a simple flat rate; others will charge a sliding scale including provision for charging on the volume of traffic (gigabytes of data sent or downloaded). Initially the pricing will be attractive to companies and to intensive home users such as teleworkers or people running e-businesses from their homes. Over time, competition will drive down prices so that we all become accustomed to "always on" Internet service.


Check out our other Frequently Asked Questions:
Telework | E-commerce | Telecooperation


For comments or questions on this page, please use the feedback form

Site navigation: ETO Home | Telework | Teletrade | Telecooperation
Resources database | Events | Presentations
FAQs | Search the site | Be kept informed | Join the on-line discussion
Development of European Telework Online has been supported by ETD, an initiative of the European Commission (DGXIII) ACTS programme
Page address: http://www.eto.org.uk/faq/faqterm/htm